More about LensVIEW(TM)


LensVIEWTM is a CD-ROM database of lens design examples which is dedicated to making lens design data more accessible to the optical designer or engineer. LensVIEW currently has complete information on more than 32,000 individual lens designs from the US patent literature, the Japanese patent literature, as well as The Zeiss Index of Photographic Lenses and is updated yearly. LensVIEW design data can be searched using 57 different optical and bibliographic parameters. A special LensVIEW Classification System having 110 different categories is also included to make searching easier. Data for each design can be viewed in a series of user-selectable windows. There are separate windows for navigation, bibliographic data, complete inventor data, U.S. and international classification data, optical data, optical prescription, LensVIEW classification, lens layout drawings, and longitudinal aberration curves. LensVIEW includes translators to create lens files which can be read by several different optical design programs, including ACCOS, CODEV, OSLO, SIGMA and ZEMAX
 
 

The 2003.1 release of LensVIEW is now shipping!

With the 2003 release, LensVIEW contains more than 32,000 optical design examples (more than 64,000 individual zoom positions) which is an increase of  almost 2,000 designs from our last release. LensVIEW now has a total of over 14,700 Japanese patent, 16,500 US patent and 1,000 Zeiss Index designs entered and catalogued for easy searching.
 
 



BACKGROUND

LensVIEW was inspired by book-based databases of lens designs and patent information by van Monckhoven [1], Steinheil and Voit [2], von Rohr [3], Conrady [4], Merté et al. [5], Merté [6], Flügge [7], Cox [8], Smith [9, 14], Bird [10], Kingslake [11], Rutten and van Venrooij [12] and Laikin [13]. A primary virtue of book-based databases is their user-friendliness. LensVIEW has been designed to retain as much book-like user friendliness as possible while taking advantage of the versatility and depth of coverage made possible by computer technology.



 
 

DATA VALIDITY

There are several difficulties in transforming the raw optical data from the literature into a form suitable for computer evaluation. The main difficulty is that very few published designs include information about lens apertures or vignetting. Every design in LensVIEW has been analyzed by raytracing, and reasonable clear apertures have been calculated for every surface. These clear apertures are provided as a convenience for optical designers and should not be viewed as authoritative.

Another difficulty is that many published designs omit the field of view, and some omit the f-number. In these cases, reasonable values are provided as a convenience. These values are based on ray tracing analysis and on comparison with similar lenses for which field and/or aperture data are provided. Many patent designs also omit the location of the aperture stop. In most cases it is fairly easy to determine the appropriate air space in which to locate the stop, but in some cases, such as telephoto lenses and zoom lenses, a trial and error approach based on ray tracing is required. In many cases the stop location is indicated by a drawing but is not specified exactly in the prescription. All designs in LensVIEW are assigned an exact stop position which is either given explicitly in the patent example or is a reasonable value derived from a combination of ray tracing analysis and common sense.

Still another difficulty is that there are often typographical errors in the optical prescriptions found in the patent literature. Most of these are sign errors or a misplaced decimal point. Fortunately, these types of errors are easy to find and correct because they tend to have a major impact on the focal length of the system. Incorrect digits have a varying degree of impact on the performance of the design depending on where the digit is located. A great deal of effort has been spent on correcting these errors to make the designs in LensVIEW as useful as possible.



 
 

DATA SCALING

Optical designs come in a wide range of scales. Many designs (especially those from patents) are scaled so that the focal length is 1, 10 or 100. Many other designs are left in the scale intended for their application. As a result, the range of focal lengths of patent designs varies by a factor of about 1000. One of the purposes of LensVIEW is to enable lens designers to quickly scan and compare a large number of designs. In order to simplify this process as much as possible, all of the non-afocal designs in LensVIEW are scaled so that the focal length is 100. Zoom lenses are scaled so that the shortest focal length position has a focal length of 100. Thus a 10:1 zoom lens would be scaled so that its focal length varies from 100 to 1000.

Afocal systems cannot be conveniently scaled according to focal length, but are instead scaled so that the exit pupil has a diameter of 10. In order to compute aberration curves and other parameters which can be compared with those computed for non-afocal systems, a paraxial lens having a focal length of 100 is placed at the exit pupil of the scaled afocal systems in LensVIEW. In a few cases there is a departure from afocality which is pronounced enough to require a paraxial lens with a shorter focal length, and in these cases a paraxial lens having a focal length of either 50, 25 or 10 is used as required.



 
 

DATA SOURCES

LensVIEW now contains data from a few different sources. The particulars of those sources and a few words about how they are handled in LensVIEW is included below:

1) U.S. Patents: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231 USA, USPTO Phone: (800) PTO-9199, WebSite: http://www.uspto.gov In order for a U.S. patent to be granted, the inventor must state at least one claim as to how the patent differs from the ‘prior art’. In order to defend this claim, optical design patents usually include several lens design examples which illustrate the concept of the claim(s). In rare cases, patents can contain more than 50 lens design examples. For each patent included in LensVIEW, the optical prescription for every example in that patent is also included. The user of LensVIEW is responsible for determining if using a patent example will infringe on an active patent’s claim(s).

2) Japanese Patents: Patent Information Division, General Administration Department, Patent Office, 3-4-3, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100, Japan. WebSite: http://www.jpo-miti.go.jp Please note that bibliographic data for the Japanese patent lens designs included in LensVIEW are currently limited to patent number and issue date, application number and filing date, as well as the patent assignee. Future updates to LensVIEW will increase this bibliographic information. However, Japanese patent examples currently in LensVIEW contain complete optical prescriptions and can be conveniently browsed and searched on over 30 optical parameters and over 100 different LensVIEW classification categories. Additionally, all Japanese lens designs are fully exportable to the standard optical design file formats noted previously.

3) Zeiss Index: W.W. Merté, The Zeiss Index of Photographic Lenses (Volume 1), September 1950, translated from the German: April 1949. Originally published by THE CENTRAL AIR DOCUMENTS OFFICE (Army-Navy-Air Force), Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH (note: this office is now non-existent). A compilation of lens formulas obtained from the Zeiss Works. In general, the list of objectives has been arranged by types, such as Tessar, Cooke, Hektor, …etc. Each type of objective is described by pertinent descriptive information, as well as assigned EFL, FOV and F/# information from Merté. All this information taken directly from the Zeiss Index is presented and can be searched on as BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA. OPTICAL DATA (EFL, EPD ..etc.) may not coincide exactly with Merté’s chosen values due to the default LensVIEW scaling and other considerations (see sections 2.1 and 2.2).



 
 

REFERENCES

1) Désiré van Monckhoven, Photographic Optics; Including the Description of Lenses and Enlarging Apparatus, translated from the original French by Robert Hardwicke, Piccadilly, London, 1867, reprinted by Arno Press, New York, NY, 1979. 2) Adolph Steinheil and Ernest Voit, Handbuch der Angewandten Optik, circa 1890, translated from the original German and edited by James Weir French as Applied Optics: The Computation of Optical Systems, (2 volumes), Blackie and Son Limited, London, 1918. 3) Moritz von Rohr, Theorie und Geschichte des Photographischen Objektivs, Julius Springer, Berlin, 1899, reprinted by Arno Press, New York, NY, 1979. 4) A. E. Conrady, Applied Optics and Optical Design, (2 parts), Part One published by Oxford University Press, London, 1929, and republished by Dover, New York, NY, 1957; Part Two is a posthumous publication edited and completed by Rudolf Kingslake and Fred H. Perrin, published by Dover, New York, NY, 1960. 5) Willy Merté, Robert Richter, and Moritz von Rohr, Das Photographische Objectiv, Julius Springer, Vienna, 1932. 6) Willy Merté, The Zeiss Index of Photographic Lenses, (2 volumes), published by the Central Air Documents Office, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, 1950. 7) Johannes Flügge, Das Photographische Objektiv, Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1955. 8) Arthur Cox, A System of Optical Design; The Basics of Image Assessment and of Design Techniques with a Survey of Current Lens Types, Focal Press, London and New York, NY, 1964. 9) Warren J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering: The Design of Optical Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1966. 10) Thomas S. Bird, Geometrical Lens Designs in the U.S. Patent Literature, published by Thomas S. Bird, Dallas, TX, 1969. 11) Rudolf Kingslake, Lens Design Fundamentals, Academic Press, 1978. 12) Harrie Rutten and Martin van Venrooij, Telescope Optics: Evaluation and Design, Willmann-Bell, Richmond, VA, 1988. 13) Milton Laikin, Lens Design, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, 1991. 14) Warren J. Smith and Genesee Optics Software, Inc., Modern Lens Design: A Resource Manual, McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1992.