1998 International Optical Design Conference
Lens Design Problem

DESIGN SUMMARY PAGE 


Overview of this page:

The 1998 International Optical Design Conference (IODC) was held July 8-12, 1998 in Kona, Hawaii. It was co-sponsored by OSA and SPIE. The IODC traditionally includes one or more lens design problems for members of the optical design community to consider. This time, the design problem consisted of designing a solid glass lens with no intervening air spaces between the first and last surfaces of the lens. The definition/statement of the design problem can be found here.

A paper entitled "LENS DESIGN PROBLEM SUMMARY: The Solid Glass Lens" will be published in SPIE Proceedings Volume 3482 due out in September/October 1998. This paper summarizes the design solutions submitted, highlights the best designs and considers some interesting points brought to light as a result of the endeavor. Since some of the optical prescriptions submitted as solutions were quite long, this web page is being provided as a companion piece to the paper published in SPIE Proceedings Volume 3482. This web page is not meant as a replacement for the information contained in the paper. This page will be maintained by Optical Data Solutions, Inc. until at least July 1, 1999.

Once again, many thanks to all the design problem entrants and optical software code vendors for their particpation in making the execution of the IODC design problem a successful one.

Sincerely,
Leo Gardner
Vice President, Optical Data Solutions, Inc.
General Chair, IODC '98

Informational Notes About The Table:

File: The identities of designers have been concealed by using the random assignment of an alpha-numeric list. In the summary IODC presentation and paper, only the top few names and affiliations will be revealed.

Format: This column lists the format of the prescription file. This listing is necessary so readers of this page know how to translate the optical prescription file. It does not necessarily indicate that the design was optimized in that code.

MF Value: This column contains the estimate of the Merit Function. The numbers presented here were calculated by using a large number of rays in a rectangular sampling grid centered about the chief ray. It is acknowledged that centering the sampling grid about the centroid of the spot may have been a more appropriate choice and would have yielded slightly different performance numbers, but subsequent evaluation indicated that centroiding didn’t appear to change the relative ranking of designs.

Designer's Comments: Most of the entrants were surveyed via electronic mail and asked to respond to a few short questions regarding their design problem submissions. Some their responses are contained here. Editing is minimal.

How To Access Data:

The following table contains prescription data in separate files. To view prescription files or comment files, left-click on the desired filename. To download prescription or comment files, right-click on the desired filename and choose "Save Link As..." (or similar depending on your browser) from the subsequent pop-up menu.
 
Files Format MF
Value
General 
Comments
Designer's
Comments
D29.seq CodeV 0.9    CommD29.txt
D18.seq CodeV 1.0    CommD18.txt
D03.len OSLO 1.3    CommD03.txt
D11.zmx ZEMAX 1.4    CommD11.txt
D05.len OSLO 3.0    CommD05.txt
D26.zmx
sumita.agf
ZEMAX 4.9 Extra file needed in Zemax
for Sumita Corp glasses
 CommD26.txt
D30.seq CodeV 5.1    CommD30.txt
D27.zmx
sumita.agf
ZEMAX 5.6 Extra file needed in Zemax
for Sumita Corp glasses
 
D12.seq CodeV 6.0    CommD12.txt
D28.zmx ZEMAX 7.4    
D09.zmx
oldglas1.agf
ZEMAX 8.5 Extra file needed in 
Zemax for older glasses
 CommD09.txt
D23.len OSLO 10.7    CommD23.txt
D13.zmx ZEMAX 15.5    CommD13.txt
D17.zmx ZEMAX 15.5    CommD17.txt
D40.zmx ZEMAX 17.1    
D33.seq CodeV 19.8    
D21.len OSLO 24.9    CommD21.txt
D41.rle SYNOPSYS 25.9    CommD41.txt
D16.seq CodeV 27.7    CommD16.txt
D36.lns SIGMA 29.3  CommD36.txt
D35.len OSLO 30.7    CommD35.txt
D31.seq CodeV 35.0    CommD31.txt
D32.seq CodeV 35.3    
D07.seq CodeV 44.8    CommD07.txt
D37.zmx ZEMAX 55.0    CommD37.txt
D22.rle SYNOPSYS 56.0    
D02.zmx ZEMAX 57.2    CommD02.txt
D24.zmx ZEMAX 70.3    CommD24.txt
D20.zmx ZEMAX 80.2    
D15.zmx ZEMAX 87.2    CommD15.txt
D34.seq CodeV 97.1    CommD34.txt
D08.zmx ZEMAX 97.2    
D38.zmx ZEMAX 138    CommD38.txt
D14.zmx ZEMAX 139    
D01.zmx ZEMAX 160 Fails mass (penalty not incl. in MF)  CommD01.txt
D06.zmx ZEMAX 216    CommD06.txt
D25.zmx ZEMAX 350 3 element solution  CommD25.txt

Congratulations to the designers of the top designs:


For questions about this page or to submit ideas for future IODC Design Problems please contact gardner(at)lambdares.com.

ODS Home Page

Last Modified: October 20, 2006